Michael Drayton's Poly-Olbion poem from 1612 is hard to follow. Even when I had the map side-by-side with it you think things are coming up based on the map and you're looking for them but then its like another 20 lines (or more) before the landmark you're looking for is actually mentioned. Once things in the poem go rolling along it was much easier to follow though. It is also a very pretty map.
John Wilson Foster's article on topographical poetry mentions a lot about how historical musings, recollections and reflections are common in this genre of poetry which made the mentions of King Arthur and Trojan war in the poem make much more sense.
In the Poly-Olbion, line 183 of Song One mentions King Arthur's battle with Mordred. It explains how the river Camel was the backdrop for this fight but also that it was the birth place of Arthur. Camel... sounds a lot like Camelot. The river is saddened by Arthur's death so long ago; she has a personality. Many of the rivers and waters and islands in Drayton's poem are gendered and have names, have personalities.
Foster also outlines the "five genre characteristics of topographical poetry": "use of extensive description; use of space as a patterning device; use of time-projections; use of extended metaphor; development of a controlling moral vision" (pg. 403). Do some or all of these characteristics show up in the Poly-Olbion? A thorough investigation would be required, but based on what I've read so far, time-projection, extended metaphor and controlling moral vision all appear in Song One.
As part of this section of the class, it was also recommended that we read part of a book on origins of the British Ordinance Survey that was started all the way back in the mid-1750s. I quite enjoyed this bit of informational reading. It obviously needed someone super into mapping like William Roy to get things really going on the survey despite so many delays over the many years before it can to fruition.
The theodolite instrument that was used in the ordinance survey also sounds really neat!
__________________________________________
Reading further ahead into the cognitive and mental mapping part of the course was intense and very fascinating. The short story, "A Good Man is Hard to Find" by Flannery O'Connor was the intense part. It did not go the way I was thinking and more violent than I anticipated. I'm curious how the story fits into the mental mapping exercise that was explored in the article - I mean, I think I have an idea, but I'm still interested on how it fits in with the course materials and the direction of the class.
Speaking of the case study - It was really neat! The explanation and exploration of how mental mapping works was fascinating. I like that it showed and broke down some of the maps that the students created as part of the project. Everyone's mind works so differently when visualizing and then trying to map out the descriptions of a book. It tied in really well with all the discussion we already had with More's Utopia. Do things match up with the representations and the text? What is more prominent, more important between the different maps the participants made? How is spatiality converted and depicted from description to cartographic representation?
__________________________________________
I'm ahead in my readings so that I have ample time to tackle Gaiman's Neverwhere (1996) in good time for mid-March. Before that is a section of readings on maps as analytical instruments. I'll probably work that information into the Field Notes post for Neverwhere as well as we get two weeks with that book as well as a few other articles.

.jpg)
.jpg)



